On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:40:58AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> It could be a Xclaim3D. AFAIK these were built with either a 3D RAGE II+ (like
> mine) or a 3D RAGE Pro.
>
> > smaller chip that says "Nexus GA 42601" on it.
>
> That's probably the firmware ROM. So it contains `Nexus GA' firmware, and is
> probably a Nexus GA ;-)
>
> BTW, what connectors are there on the card? My Xclaim3D has a 15-pin VGA
> connector and a Mac monitor connector.
>
The card has a Mac monitor connector and a VGA
connector. However, both NexusGA cards and Xclaim3D
cards have both these connectors.
> > But then the kernel seem to recognize it
> > as a Mach64 card. X however recognizes it as both a
> > ATI 3D Rage Pro and a Mach64, witness the X log:
>
> Mach64 is the name for all ATI 64-bit graphics accelerators. It covers the
> following families:
> - GX: earliest version, external clockchip and RAMDAC
> - CT: integrated clockchip and RAMDAC
> - VT: video extensions
> - GT: 3D extensions (i.e. 3D RAGE)
> o GT-B: 3D RAGE II and II+
> o GT-C: 3D RAGE Pro
> - LT: for laptops
>
> > However, r128 X driver does not work on this card
> > and reports "No devices detected".
>
> Indeed, RAGE 128 is the next generation of ATI, using a 128-bit architecture.
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
So you're using a Xclaim3D card? Have you
experienced the problems that I am experiences with
mine? (if it really is a Xclaim3D)
Thanks for your help.
--
wcrowshaw
