On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 04:18:57PM +0100, Oliver Ripka wrote: > > I suggest a sid-system. does someone else have suggestions ? > > Think, in 1 or 2 days we have somewhat useful. > > Nice thing, you are doing there. So the treath was not in every way > useless.
:) > But, do you really want to make the cd off a the unstable tree? good question. unstable / stable both have their existence. > IMHO the current unstable tree is _really_ what is called to be: > unstable. let say dangerouse :) some people say a unstable debian is more stable than a german S**E. > Some examples: > > - mol does work since about 3 weaks > - install-keymap does not work since latest dpkg-upgrade > - evolution is broken > > this is not a good basis for a live cd. that a packager waits 3 weeks in order to fix a bug ? > So my suggestion is to use stable. > IÂŽm also a friend of stable. ButI`m not sure if it makes sense to backport 1000 of packages. But if you promise to send me the missing packages i`ll choose woody.I guess we hit a common problem Cheers amu
