On Don, 2003-01-09 at 02:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 02:08:17PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
>
> > I've been using the low latency patch for quite a long time with good
> > results and no problems, the caveat is that it doesn't patch
> > arch/ppc/config.in yet so it's not actually used unless you add
> > CONFIG_LOLAT there.
>
> Ok, as long as I'm recompiling tonight, I'll throw these in - so do I
> just add a line:
>
> define_bool CONFIG_LOWLAT y
>
> at the top of linux/arch/ppc/config.in?
More or less, here's what I use.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast
--- linux-2.4.20-ben1/arch/ppc/config.in 2002-12-14 13:53:11.000000000
+0100
+++ linux-2.4.20-ben1-xfs-ck/arch/ppc/config.in 2002-12-28 01:53:34.000000000
+0100
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ else
define_bool CONFIG_PPC_STD_MMU n
fi
+bool 'Low latency scheduling' CONFIG_LOLAT
+dep_bool 'Control low latency with sysctl' CONFIG_LOLAT_SYSCTL $CONFIG_LOLAT
+
bool 'CPU Frequency scaling' CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
if [ "$CONFIG_CPU_FREQ" = "y" ]; then
bool ' /proc/sys/cpu/ interface (2.4.)' CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_24_API
