On Mit, 2002-11-20 at 04:26, Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings! On ppc, GCL loads binary object modules at specific > address in its lisp core, relocating them via a call to > bfd_get_relocated_section_contents. This works in general, but in > certain cases of many such loadings and a large base executable, the > routine reports that function symbols in the module overflow on > attempted relocation. I thought this was a TOC issue, and could be > addressed via -mminimal-toc, but no dice. All tests thus far with gcc > 2.95, but I'm inclined to think that 3.2 will be the same. > > Does this problem ring a bell (and hopefully a solution) with anyone?
Just a guess: maybe some code needs to be built with -fPIC? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast
