"Albert D. Cahalan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I wrote documentation. Be glad I did. If you don't think it looks > real pretty, you can offer a CORRECT replacement. That is, you have > to do some pretty foul *roff stuff to avoid getting line breaks and > hyphens when they don't belong.
One doesn't even have to muck with *roff anymore nowadays, since we have packages like docbook2man, docbook-to-man, and docbk-xml2x, right? I don't know which of those is better, though.
