On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 05:38:59PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 09:17:11PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > So Tom's gotten ahead of me on merges. It's still generally true. It > > not for 2.2 its not, and hasn't been for a very long time, since > 2.2.17 in actuality. 2.4.10pre6 or so is said to be nearly complete > in the powerpc merge (says Tom Rini). 2.4.8 was plenty far enough for > most purposes (except laptops), 2.4.9 had some minor breakage (on more > then just powerpc, sparc too). > > > will also go into kernel.org if I put it into bitkeeper. This is all > > dodging the actual issue. > > your talking about changing this default upstream? that is a different > issue. i object to debian's kernel behaving differently then all > other kernels in use everywhere else. however changing this default > out from under people EVERYWHERE i think is a very very bad idea.
I'm not talking about changing the defaults for anything. I'm talking about a config option so that we default to Linux keycodes but anyone who needs ADB keycodes can get them. I'm not even entirely convinced it is necessary. That's getting lost again. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
