David N. Welton writes: > "Berg, Björn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> NetBSD has also a not so free sourcecode (I see it as package not >> only the Kernel). Some parts are not published under GPL (like >> Linux) but under the BSD License which restricts developers and >> users. > > That's not correct. The BSD license is more liberal than the GPL, Nope. The original BSD license places restrictions on how you may advertize BSD-based products. (must mention UC Berkeley) While the university has dropped this requirement, many people cloned the license with their own name in place of UC Berkeley. Thus you may not advertize NetBSD without including a huge list of contributers.
