Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > To prevent it from backing up /boot, /proc etc.
Ah, ok. I usually do that with excludes. But if you have few filesystems, then using -x makes more sense, I agree. > And I assume the 'pass' field should be set to 0? I think so. > XFS has been running fine so far, it's a good feeling. :) > > Let me take this opportunity to warn people not to trust any > important data to reiserfs. I've seen it lose all data on my gf's > cube from one second to the other. I considered that a personal > warning to move to something better. Yeah, XFS has been pretty stable for me. The only trouble I've really ever had was with 2.4.6 + XFS CVS; I got minor corruption after a kernel panic. But 2.4.8-pre3 + XFS CVS has only dropped me into xmon once (likely not XFS related), and I've encountered no problems with corruption or anything else. > PS: Hey Colin, I remembered to remove you from the To: header. ;) Hehe. Well, you should be able to set up your mailer to do this automatically for mailing lists...
