"Wilhelm Fitzpatrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Has anyone else noticed that the versions of xemacs in testing and > unstable seem to be getting more and more unstable? > > The problem I'm seeing is that xemacs will stop responding, and top > shows it eating all available CPU time. I first noticed this about > a month ago, while using the version of xemacs that was in testing > at the time, so I updated to unstable, and since then have gone > through several version in unstable, with problem just seeming to > get more frequent. Sometimes after I kill a runaway xemacs process, > xemacs will no longer run, and I have to reinstall it.
Yes I have noticed this, but not often. What I notice is that XEmacs leaves screen turds all over the place in it's buffers. Also I seem to get a lot more errors in installed packages than I ever did before. jas.
