Hi, Michel Dänzer writes:
> The modules-source package doesn't work for me. At first, make > failed because the Makefile contained two instances of $(SMAKE) > instead of $(MAKE). Fixed that Fixed, together with two more occurences of $(SMAKE). > make: *** /usr/src/modules/mol/buildtools: No such file or directory. Stop. Fixed that one as well. The Rules.make file insisted on having this, but I fooled it. Adam Goode writes: > it would be very nice if you didn't Recommend kernel-headers. I > think a Suggests would be fine, and would make dselect less likely > to install extra stuff. Okay. > Oh, and I think you're forgetting to clean the modules-source after > processing with kernel-package, because I had to manually do a > modules_clean after getting a new kernel version. Apparently this is handled differently by different packages. The man page for make-kpkg just states that make-kpkg modules_image creates the binary package. device3dfx-source, which I used as a template, does just that. So I had a look at alsa-source, where the kdist and kdist_image targets of debian/rules also clean the modules source. I followed that example, and mol-modules-source should now work as you expect. While I was at it, I also added a proper kdist target that generates a changes file. Jonas Smedegaard didn't write anything but sent me a patch, parts of which I added. Anyway, thanks to everybody who replied. The packages for version 0.9.60-2 are now in incoming. Regards, Jens. -- J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe! Le veux aimeb et mqubib panz je pézqbpbe je djuz tqtaj!
