On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 06:44:10PM -0700, David Schleef wrote: > On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 07:46:57PM -0700, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 10:11:02AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > > It's not in unstable or testing. Eek. How'd that happen?? > > > > I'll try to un-lag it later this week. > > > How do packages like this fit into the autobuilder? I get (on > x86): > > $ apt-cache show pcmcia-modules-2.2.19 > > Package: pcmcia-modules-2.2.19 > Source: pcmcia-cs (3.1.27-2) > > $ apt-cache showsrc pcmcia-cs > > Package: pcmcia-cs > Binary: pcmcia-source, pcmcia-cs > > I don't see how pcmcia-modules-2.2.19 would be build without > special rules.
The Binary lines for module packages almost always lie. It works out anyway :) -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
