> >AFAIK the airport unload hack is no longer required with 2.4 kernels >(what's with 2.2.19?). If Ben says 2.4 sleep support on Core99 is stable, >I'll just have to check the kernel version number and either shutdown or >sleep. If someone backports the Core99 sleep code to 2.2, the better.
2.2.19 don't have an up-do-date airport driver. Sleep support on core99 appear to be stable with my tree and with bk _2_4_devel tree if you don't enable the thermal management. You need my tree's APM emulation if you plan to use DRI, or X may lockup when going to sleep. Note that pmud should also detect the new /proc/pmu and use battery infos from here instead of polling the PMU. Don't implement that immediately as I may still change the format of /proc/pmu in the upcoming days, it will be stable once pushed to bk _2_4_devel. Porting to 2.2 may be a bit tricky as a lot of code is involved in the sleep process (a lot of drivers are affected). Ben.