On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 07:58:20PM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
> 
> don't forget sed and nano-tiny!  Is the controversy over, and
> nano-tiny just nano now, or was there a just plain nano all along? 
> Inquiring minds...

boot-floppies now use nano-tiny, we have taken ae out back and shot it
in the head, then we let the `traceroute should be in /usr/bin!'
people go out and beat it's dead carcus until there was nothing left
that could remotly be recognizable.

i don't know whats different about nano vs nano-tiny, other then one
being smaller then the other.  they are both far to crippled for my
tastes.  (but at least they don't suck mountains through coffee
stirrers like ae does). 

-- 
Ethan Benson 
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

Attachment: pgpouIrONNK7V.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to