On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 03:26:03PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 11:05:39PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > Well, the big deal is that to enable LFS on glibc, it must be compiled > > against 2.4.0 headers. This does not break when running on 2.2.x > You mean we have to make binNMUs of glibc? Or will you make a new upload > which explicitly requests kernel-headers 2.4.0? > > > arch I build myself). I would like all other archs to follow suit > > (whoever builds glibc for that particular arch), even if it means using > > local 2.4.0 source (and not something in the archive) so long as you > > plan to fill this gap once a 2.4.0/2.4.1 source is available in sid. > Right now I only see this in the pools: kernel-image-2.4.0-test11-i386 > There isn't an official 2.4.0 source yet in the archive? > Besides, we could probably build kernel-images for 2.4 on m68k, but they do > not work so well yet (at least on my box the IDE driver is not yet working, > rendering the kernel useless for me). Do you want those in the archive? But > who cares, I even uploaded xfree4.0 now to make the archive happy... > > > with ppc, i386 and sparc. Any other ports that want me to keep them in sync, > > feel free to donate h/w. > How about using debian funds to pay that hardware? I only have one m68k > machine, I am not sure if I want to donate that one to you, I could not work > for m68k anymore then. > Or maybe get it donated by somebody else, and not necessarily by a > developer, after all I am "donating" quite a lot already. IMHO.
I have a spare A1200 with 68030 processor lying around, it has no harddisk though. Would that count toward donating hardware ? Friendly, Svne Luther
