On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 05:39:53PM +0100, Robert Ramiega wrote: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 09:21:12AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 05:08:52PM +0100, Robert Ramiega wrote: > > > > > I also noticed that gcc is still at "potato" version. I remeber seeing > > > on > > > some other Debian ML that upgrade of libc6 should go with upgrade of > > > gcc. > > > Is that true or should i rather wait for buildd to rebuild gcc ? > > > > woody/x86 is still at gcc 2.95.2. Hopefully it'll stay there until > > gcc-3.0 beta (or so..). > I guess i should write it more clearly =o((( (sorry for last 2 weeks > i live almost on-the-run). I know that woody/x86 is at gcc 2.95.2. I was > refering to debian package version (2.95.2-17 i think was rebuild with glibc > 2.1.9x)...
It has been rebuilt vs 2.1.9x, but the reason (so says the changelog) was for other things. :) -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
