On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 09:47:19PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 03:31:28PM -0700, Bradley C. Midgley wrote: > > hi guys > > > > i would like to see mol added to the available packages (or at least do a > > one-off proper package), so i started trying to build it from inside > > debian. a couple of notes: > > packages certainly would be nice, i have to do all kinds of patching > to make the damn thing go into /usr/local where it belongs. there is > more to life then .rpm sheesh....
I'm still planning on doing this. I should have a machine to do it on sometime in the next week or two. > > 2. libelf is not explicitly linked into mol. i've sent a patch upstream > > but i don't know why it would work without -lelf under redhat. hmmph. > > yup i don't know why this is still broken it *should* fail everywhere > but i suspect nobody actually compiles this bugger themselves. adding > -lelf to the linker arguments in Rules.make seems to work fine... I'll poke around at this - it's probably a more fundamental library difference. Dan /--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\ | Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
