On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 12:19:32PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > (Old thread, but...) > > Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 06:38:18PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > > > > I noticed the kerberos4kth packages aren't in non-us for PPC or ARM. > > > I've attached a patch which makes it build and work (basically the same > > > as my old one), but the maintainer (Greg Stark) doesn't like it. His > > > objections: > > > > > > * The int arguments in va_arg calls should break shorts, and also > > > longs on 64-bit platforms. And yet, it builds with the patch, > > > doesn't without it. Tom Rini, your 12/15/99 debian-powerpc post > > > was the basis of that part of the patch, do you know what's going > > > on? Is va_args somehow broken for PPC and/or ARM. > > > > IIRC, my patch was accepted upstream around the same time I posted on > > debian-powerpc. It of course wasn't important enough to warrent a new > > release of the package. > > Apparently, your patch was undone at some point before 1.0, or else someone > added new va_args material which required my new patch. Can you point to > somewhere in the new source where your va_args work is there, so the > maintainer (Greg Stark) will accept this part of the patch?
It seems they were undone or just got lost somewhere along the line. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
