On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 05:09:00PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote: > err, maybe i misunderstood, but the kernel-image source package only contains > the patches, and will source depend on kernel-source-version to get the full > kernel.
Ooops, you're right. I consider kernel-patch preferable to kernel-image, because it means that, for example, people can try to also apply kernel-patch-int or whatever it's called these days. > How do you solve the problem of kernel-package generated kernel-image being > refused because they don't have a source line in the control file ? They're marked as having Source: kernel-source-2.2.14 here... it's not 100% accurate, but it's close enough. > > Console-data may be taken care of. Joey Hess was working on it all of > > Monday. I'm seeing right now if it builds. > > Last i checked it still didn't work on apus, will check it nextly. I didn't even try an APUS build. Console stuff did install all right, though, and even the keymaps seem ok. There's a new ppc boot floppies in incoming if anyone wants to try them. I really doubt they can be worse than what we have in the archive now. Dan /--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\ | Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
