>> ... by the way, yes it is *unstable*, I know it. But this must not >> necessarily imply that it *must* crash, right? One can also upload >> the new packages and leave the freedom to the others to do some >> beta-testing or keep the old one, right?
> Right, but when people develop on i386 or whatever, and upload > source packages, which are built by autobuilders for the other > platforms, one should expect that things might not work. > > I think that's one reason autobuilders are prohibited from uploading > to frozen/ as well as stable/. I perfectly agree, but you are not adding much to what I said. Please have a look at the directory /debian/dists/frozen/main/binary-powerpc/x11 where enlightenment-data_0.16.3-7.deb enlightenment-theme-bluesteel_0.16.3-7.deb enlightenment-theme-brushedmetal_0.16.3-7.deb enlightenment-theme-shinymetal_0.16.3-7.deb but enlightenment_0.16.3-6.deb Shall we conclude that ``frozen'' is, de facto, a synonym for ``unstable''? Or shall frozen better contain the 0.16.3-6 packages? Sergio
