> > > Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
> > > in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
> >
> > PowerPC has more or less given up on making 2.1. We're moving well,
> > but I'm of the inclination we shouldn't release until we have a truly
> > stabilized libc - or at least until we're a lot closer.
>
> Right, powerpc shouldn't go in right now. We have more then 200 packages
> uncompiled (many maintainer doesn't response for bug lists!!!).
Okay, thanks.
> We need a 2.1.x kernel source package, which isn't available for debian.
I don't see why you couldn't create one just for the powerpc arch. Either
way, v2.2 of the kernel should be available before v2.2 of Debian.
> Brian and the other arch maintainer with 2.1 kernels: what about to
> have the linux-cvs tree (as a debian package) in experimental?? This
> will help. Linux-2.1.125 is very near on linux-2.2 !!
I'm afraid I don't understand. What do you mean about the linux-cvs tree?
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Friends are relatives that you make for yourself.
