Guy Maor wrote:
> 
> 

> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 20:54:40 +0200 (CEST)
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: mail failed, returning to sender
> 
> |------------------------- Failed addresses follow: ---------------------|
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ... transport smtp: 550 relaying to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> prohibited by administrator
> |------------------------- Message text follows: ------------------------|
> Received: at Infodrom Oldenburg (/\##/\ Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #2)
>       from master.debian.org by finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE
>       via smail with smtp
>       id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>       for <unknown>; Sat, 10 Oct 1998 20:54:36 +0200 (CEST) 
> Received: from ([209.176.56.5]) by teergrube (10 sec delayed, relaying denied)
> Received: (qmail 19938 invoked by uid 878); 10 Oct 1998 18:54:34 -0000
> Date: 10 Oct 1998 18:54:34 -0000
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Debian/powerpc Build Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: xpuzzles_5.4.4-2_powerpc.changes INSTALLED
> 
> [body not included]
> 

Args.  I was told that this was fixed yesterday, so I didn't pay
attention anymore.  Apparently it was not.  I apologize for my lack
for administrator duties.

I'm sorry, but people keep installing exim but forget about contacting
me about it.

I have now re-installed Smail since it's the MTA that causes least trouble
and I'm able to configure it.

It provides:

 . Local user delivery

 . Support for ~/.forward files

 . Support for real-user to bypass a .forward file

 . Localhost is localhost, tervola, tervola.infodrom.north.de
   and powerpc.debian.org

 . Outgoing mail is sent to a smarthost

 . Incoming mail is only accepted from the 0 MX machine.

 . Execution via inetd, limited by tcpd

Please don't change it without notifying me.

The same setup should be installed on kullervo.  If not, I might get over
and remove exim there in order to install Smail, too.

Regards,

        Joey

-- 
The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from.
        -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum

Reply via email to