On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 15:33 -0700, Geoff Levand wrote: > I had a problem when building for ppc440 (gcc -m405). I wonder if we > need some conditionals on the DSSALL statement as below, or is DSSALL > intended to be a perprocessor macro that would expand to a blank line > in this case?
No, but the cpu feature bit will make the dssall be nop'ed out on your CPU. I though we were passing -many to gas in all cases, don't we ? Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
