On Sun, 15 May 2005 the mental interface of Eddy Petrisor told: > Paul Brossier wrote: > >On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 01:45:39AM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > >>Am I the only who got impressed? > >No, I am also running a 2.6.12-rc4 and I found it very stable, with much > >improvements over the 2.6.9+patch7. Software suspend and usb are no more > >a problem, at worst all it takes is a hotplug restart for some devices > >to wake up. And with a .config derived from the derived stock kernels, > >the transition was really smooth. > > Ok, you've made me curious. I want to try it, as I run now 2.6.9+sleep7. > So, in order to take 2.6.12-rc4, I will need 2.6.11.9 [1] and the patch for > 2.6.12-rc4[2] that applies over it, right? No! 2.6.11 + patch or http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/linux-2.6.12-rc4.tar.bz2
Elimar -- It's a good thing we don't get all the government we pay for. ntp is fixed now -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
