On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 21:11 +0000, Joerg Sommer wrote: > Joerg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> Do you mean the powersave governor should controll this register too? > >>> > >>> > I'm interested to discuss this more. I have been wanting this feature > >>> > for a > >>> > while; and even have written some code for it a couple of times, but I > >>> > tend to > >>> > get distracted too easily when it comes to hobby code. > >>> > >>> Is your code anywher available? > >> > >> I would suggest you first write some kind of hack to control it via > >> sysfs or /proc and do some measurements to see if there is any real > >> benefit in throttling... > > > > Here is the hack http://www.minet.uni-jena.de/~joergs/ictc/. I don't know > > if its correct, but it doesn't make the kernel oops. > > I used this module today and I don't see any difference to the life > without. I use 254 because 255 cause very high cpu load.
Did you see a significant difference in battery consumption with different ictc values ? Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
