On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 18:09 +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > Don't be stupid, only a few people really need NPTL stuff, and you can always > follow testing/unstable once sarge is released.
This is a bogus argument actually :) It translates basically that "only a few people need more performant, more conformant and less buggy code" > > BTW, gcc-3.4 is working quite well for me. Not that > > it should be needed though; I'd have expected glibc > > to be getting at thread-local data via functions. > > Probably. There is gcc-4.0 also which i don't know the release schedule about. 3.4 branch is very stable and well behaved on ppc, it's definitely what I would recommend for now, _even_ for sarge in fact. 4.0 is still not ready to be used by anything but gcc hackers imho :) Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
