Hello, On Sat 07 Dec 2024 at 04:45pm -08, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Anecdata aside, one other way to evaluate this is to look at the type of > files packages store under /usr/share/locale. > > A look at the Contents file gives a complete list of what types of files > packages store there, which in turn indicates how they're used: [...] Thanks very much for the analysis. LGTM. > Based on that, I think it's very unlikely that a single bug will arise > from adding this policy change. I think it'd be safe to say "must" here. > But if people would nonetheless like this changed to "should", I can do > that. Well, I was thinking, would it really be a bug of RC-severity for *any* package that didn't work, if /usr/share/locale is deleted? For example, a package that is for use on workstations that didn't work properly would matter less than something for containers. So, 'should' seems more appropriate to me based on this. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
