>>>>> "Sean" == Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> writes:
Sean> In general, I agree with Santiago. I find Policy's current
Sean> scope and working process effective, and not especially
Sean> ambiguous. I think everyone should read it during the NM
Sean> process, if not sooner.
Sean> Russ has concretely considered these issues much more than me,
Sean> and Niels has worked extensively on an implementation, and I
Sean> have not. These things count, so my sense that things are
Sean> broadly okay as they are only goes so far.
I agree with the above.
When Russ brought up concerns I didn't want to add stop energy to making
things better.
But I also am generally happy with policy today. I find it useful and
refer to it often. I find that with almost all of my NM applicants I
end up asking them to look at policy at various points in the process
and they do not run into trouble using the document.
The only reason they did not before is they were not in the practice of
doing so.
