On Tuesday, April 7, 2020 7:18:42 PM EDT Guillem Jover wrote: > > +#. the distribution license for those files requires that copyright > > + information be included in all copies and/or binary distributions; > > I'm assuming the entire list is supposed to hold at the same time? If > so perhaps adding an «and» here would make this completely unambiguous.
Actually I think it would be the opposite. If we had: > + information be included in all copies and binary distributions; then I can see people claiming that since $LICENSE didn't explicitly require copyright information in both copies and binaries, they didn't have to do it. Keep in mind the example license text that I used to frame this part of the proposed change: > The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in > all copies or substantial portions of the Software. I think what you are proposing would produce the opposite of the desired policy. If you don't like and/or, then I think or is better: > + information be included in all copies or binary distributions; Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
