On Thursday, March 26, 2020 1:31:31 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote: > 4. License requires copyright notice but doesn't specify anything about > source or binary (didn't look for an example, but I can totally see this > happening): I think this case is unclear with your revised wording. With > the current policy wording copyright notices would be required in > debian/copyright and I think that's correct. The current wording does seem > harsh, so it could probably be better while not leaving an ambiguity.
Here's a specific example I am looking at in New: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
