Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> writes: > Right, what I think is in scope for Policy is advising packagers on > which readiness signaling mechanism to use if upstream supports several. > If one is relatively new to packaging daemons, this may not be something > on one's radar to look at, but there are substantial, if subtle, > advantages to using Type=notify if upstream already supports it. > (Type=dbus is fine, of course, and we probably shouldn't doument that as > well, although my guess is that things that register with D-Bus are more > likely to already know about these subtleties.)
That was supposed to be "we probably should document that as well." I think I edited that sentence too much. Sorry about the confusion. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
