On 5/1/19 10:29 PM, Bill Allombert wrote: > For package where upstream do not use the autotools, using dh can be > quite inconvenient compared to plain debhelper. No, I don't think so. With every esoteic thing I've tried to pacakge, dh was a good help. Overriding dh_auto_* when necessarry is easy, but then dh will still take care of the rest and it will also adopt when something globally changes. I'm all in favor for requiring packages to be using dh (at least new packages). -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
- Re: Bits from the DPL (April 2019) Sean Whitton
- Re: Bits from the DPL (April 2019) Joerg Jaspert
- Re: Bits from the DPL (April 2019) Bill Allombert
- Re: Bits from the DPL (April 2019) Andrey Rahmatullin
- Re: Bits from the DPL (April 2019) Bernd Zeimetz
- Re: Bits from the DPL (April 2019) Sam Hartman
- Re: Bits from the DPL (April 2019) Sean Whitton
- Re: Bits from the DPL (April 2019) Sam Hartman
- Re: Bits from the DPL (April 2019) Bill Allombert
- Re: Bits from the DPL (April 2019) Sam Hartman
- Re: Bits from the DPL (April 2019) Russ Allbery
- Re: Bits from the DPL (April 2019) Sean Whitton
- Re: Bits from the DPL (April 2019... Russ Allbery
- Re: Bits from the DPL (April ... Sean Whitton