G. Branden Robinson writes ("Re: Shouldn't shipping broken symlinks be against policy?"): > At 2018-11-13T17:02:49+0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I guess the maintainer will also think this is a bug. > > No; he closed it, and cited Policy's lack of a prohibition of shipping > broken symlinks in support of the present arrangement.
I was perplexed as to why you didn't give a reference to the bug. But I am being stupid. The bug is this bug, #913572 ! Anyway, policy doesn't prohibit a program from randomly coredumping either. I hope that this discussion will persuade the maintainer to reconsider their decision. The maintainer says if it doesn't affect the functionality of the package but of course this symlink does have a functional effect: it causes an undesirable warning message from man. Ximin, is there some reason why you can't move the symlink to the -doc package along with the manpage it refers to ? Thanks, Ian. -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.