Hi, On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 07:06:45PM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote: > Here is the complete patch, for which I am seeking seconds: > > diff --git a/policy/ch-source.rst b/policy/ch-source.rst > index 9e7d79c..011893c 100644 > --- a/policy/ch-source.rst > +++ b/policy/ch-source.rst > @@ -40,9 +40,25 @@ example, if building a package requires a certain > compiler, then the > compiler should be specified as a build-time dependency. > > It is not necessary to explicitly specify build-time relationships on a > -minimal set of packages that are always needed to compile, link and put > -in a Debian package a standard "Hello World!" program written in C or > -C++. The required packages are called *build-essential*, and an > +minimal set of packages that are always needed > + > +- to compile, link and put in a Debian package a standard "Hello > + World!" program written in C or C++; > + > +- for the package build to resolve the system hostname to a > + fully-qualified domain name using the C standard library; and > + > +- for the package build to look up longstanding and conventionally > + available service and protocol names and numbers, either by directly > + reading /etc/services and /etc/protocols, or by using the > + corresponding functions from the C standard library. [#]_ > + > + (If the package needs to look up a more recent service or protocol, > + and certainly if the service or protocol was not listed in these > + files in the package's targeted Debian releases, an appropriate > + versioned build-dependency is needed.) > + > +The required packages are called *build-essential*, and an > informational list can be found in > ``/usr/share/doc/build-essential/list`` (which is contained in the > ``build-essential`` package). [#]_ > @@ -757,6 +773,10 @@ according to this convention, the C source code of an > executable > ``debian/missing-sources/checksum/util.c``. > > .. [#] > + The functionality described in these last two list items is > + provided by the "netbase" package at the time of writing. > + > +.. [#] > Rationale: > > - This allows maintaining the list separately from the policy >
I hereby disagree with this approach.
I think that if we were going this way, build-essential should just
start depending on netbase instead.
Changing the Policy wording to say that build-essential should also
provide networking base stuff it's probably fine though.
I think we also need a wider request for /etc/services and
/etc/protocols. Till now I only heard Ian asking for it, so I believe
there needs to be a wider request.
Talking about the proposed wording: the text within parenthesis mentions
"versioned build-dependency", but the package it's talking about
(netbase, I suspect) it's only mentioned in the footnote, which is an
issue in my book.
On the note of /etc/hosts, I'm fixing the original bug rised by Simon
McVittie (that was triggered by tests.reproducible-builds.org not
resolving localhost) within pbuilder (#905307) btw.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
