積丹尼 Dan Jacobson writes ("Re: Bug#809383: mention explicitly double listing:
Depends, Recommends, Suggests"):
> Ian Jackson:
> > That doesn't seem to be an answer to Sean's question. Why do you want
> > the question of redundant dependencies dealt with in policy ? What
> > bad things are happening, or might be likely to happen, because it is
> > not mentioned ?
>
> Because I want to know if it is wrong or not.
The conclusion of the thread here is that it has no harmful effect, as
indeed would be expected. It's obviously slightly ugly in the source.
> If it is wrong then I will tell the person who did it it is wrong when I
> see it.
> If it is not wrong, then I will keep my mouth shut.
Where have you seen this ? What was the reaction of the maintainers
when you sent a patch to clean it up ?
Policy is not a place to list every possible bug, let alone every
possible slight ugliness in the source code. The point is to set
common technical standards so that everything works well together, and
to help avoid common bug patterns by documenting them.
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
