On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 9:15 PM, Bill Allombert <ballo...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 02:48:40PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> > * Some Javascript modules are very small, resulting in lots of small >> > packages >> >> I think we need to balance the small packages concern with number of >> times such small packages are used. >> >> node-has was rejected recently because it was "too small". I agree if >> only one, two or even three modules depend on it embedding it is okay (I >> have been doing that already). But when more than three modules need a >> tiny module? Is it really better to embed it that many times? > > You should not embed them. Instead you can merge several tiny > modules together and ship them as a single .deb, which eventually > Provides: node-mod1, node-mod2 etc. So package can still Depends on the > individual names.
Done for node-has using node-function-bind but it break uscan for node-has Bill could you get a glimpse, I will like to create something more robust > Cheers, > -- > Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> > > Imagine a large red swirl here. > > -- > Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list > pkg-javascript-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
