On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 09:10:12PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:34:15AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > Sean Whitton dijo [Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 11:49:59AM -0700]: > > > I am seeking seconds for the following patch to close this bug, which I > > > think is uncontroversial at this point. > > > > > > > @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ All command scripts, including the package > > > > maintainer scripts inside the > > > > package and used by ``dpkg``, should have a ``#!`` line naming the > > > > shell > > > > to be used to interpret them. > > > > > > > > -In the case of Perl scripts this should be ``#!/usr/bin/perl``. > > > > +In the case of Perl scripts this must be ``#!/usr/bin/perl``. > > > > > > > > When scripts are installed into a directory in the system PATH, the > > > > script name should not include an extension such as ``.sh`` or ``.pl`` > > > > Seconded. > > Before we make it a must, is there a lintian test for it ? > How may packages need to be fixed ?
Given Russ answer about the lintian test and result, I second this proposal. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
