Package: debian-policy Severity: normal Tags: patch User: debian-pol...@packages.debian.org Usertags: normative
Hello Ian, Iain, Gunnar, Steve, On Wed, Nov 22 2017, Ian Jackson wrote: > So to be concrete, how about this: > > N. Packages with potentially offensive content > > As a maintainer you should make a judgement about whether the > contents of a package is appropriate to include, whether it needs > any kind of content warning, and whether some parts should be split > out into a separate package (so that users who want to avoid certain > parts can do so). In making these decisions you should take into > account the project's views as expressed in our Diversity Statement. > > If you split out (potentially) offensive or disturbing material into > a separate package, you should usually mark this in the package name > by adding "-offensive". For example, "cowsay" vs > "cowsay-offensive". In this situation the "-offensive" package can > be Suggested by the core package(s), but should not be Recommended > or Depended on, so that it is not installed by default. I second this patch. I suggest we add it as section 3.1.1, i.e., as a subsection to 3.1 "The package name". Iain, Gunnar and Steve: could you repeat your seconding of this patch to this debian-policy bug, please? Kindly quote the above text that you are seconding. For posterity, the rest of the discussion outside of this bug may be found here: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/11/msg00209.html -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
