On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 10:55:30AM -0400, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello, > > I second all of Andreas' patches except the 5th and 8th. I've attached > the diff to which my second applies. > > The 5th and 8th patches introduce a normative requirement to use > debhelper. This is a first for policy, which up to now only comments > that using debhelper is "easiest". > > I've spoken to h01ger and gregoa IRL and they say that they missed the > magic word "should" which is what makes debhelper required by these > patches. So I'm seeking seconds for the following replacement for > Andreas' 5th and 8th patches:
In general, policy paragraph mentioning debhelper features are moved to footnotes. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here.
