On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 08:26:00AM +0000, Niels Thykier wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 20:43:10 +0900 Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org> wrote: > > Package: debian-policy > > Severity: normal > > > > Le Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 07:09:00PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit : > > > I have not looked at this at all, but this list should be aware that it > > > exists. > > > > > Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 09:19:04 -0400 > > > Subject: [fhs-discuss] FHS 3.0 > > > > > > The LSB workgroup is happy to announce the release of FHS 3.0. > > ... > > > Release notes can be found here: > > > > > > https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/en/FHSReleaseNotes30 > > > > Thanks Russ for the heads-up. > > > > Judging from the release notes, it would not be too hard to update the > > Policy's > > description of how Debian follows and deviates from the FHS. > > > > By the way, I wonder if the debian-policy package is the best place for > > shipping a copy of the FHS. I just checked out the bzr repository that > > contains its sources, and it builds out of the box (build-depends on xmlto > > and > > fop). Perhaps it would deserve its own package ? > > I would like to see FHS 3.0 adopted as well. Or an 2.3 exception to > allow the use of /usr/libexec.
I assume if we allow /usr/libexec, we also need to support /usr/libexec/x86_64-linux-gnu/ etc. ? Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here.
