Hello. On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:41:53PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev, debian-policy > Version: 1.17.27, 3.9.8.0 > > dpkg-source has a surprising and not-very-well-documented feature, > that it is possible to have in a `3.0 (quilt)' package a > vendor-specific series file, which is used only if the vendor matches > that of the running host.[1] > > This feature is a very bad idea. I can see why people thought it > might be nice: it means you can use the same (or very similar) .dsc > (and perhaps vcs history) on different distros. > > But it is quite wrong, because it means that the same source package > has different "contents" on different computers. [...]
While I have nothing in general against deprecating the vendor series files, since they as designed are rarely useful, it will not accomplish the goal you're stating as a reason for getting rid of them. The vendor series files are mostly useless because most of the time you want /additional/ vendor patches, but the vendor series files completely replaces the original debian/patches/series which means you duplicate the maintenance anyway and the vendor series files will likely get outdated and miss important patches. In practise what instead happens is that debian/rules gets hacked to query dpkg-vendor (or $(DEB_VENDOR)) and apply the extra patches or do derivate/vendor specific things to the package. If you go looking in the archive you'll find that this is likely much more common than the few examples you've found that uses the vendor specific series. Just to provide one example you should view the history of the changes done to the systemd package during the stretch development timeframe. (Right now there are only minor differences when building on Debian vs Ubuntu, but you should find more interesting things if you investigate the packaging history.) In reality you always need to download the binary packages that the vendor built and the users are actually running to investigate them. If you need to rebuild them you should do so on the vendors platform to be sure about them generating similar result. Thus, even if you deprecate vendor series files that will make little practical difference. I don't see the point. The only thing you'll accomplish is to make it a bit harder for different vendors to collaborate on the same source in Debian rather than downstreams carrying their own delta and we stick our head in the sand on the debian side and pretend it doesn't exist. Regards, Andreas Henriksson
