Your message dated Sat, 31 Dec 2016 18:26:52 -0800
with message-id <87inpz7bwz....@hope.eyrie.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#729325: Debian Wiki: Re: Bug#729325: debian-policy:
[FHS] /usr/local/lib/firmware not a good directory for hardware plugged in at
sytsm boot
has caused the Debian Bug report #729325,
regarding debian-policy: [FHS] /usr/local/lib/firmware not a good directory for
hardware plugged in at sytsm boot
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
729325: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729325
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-policy
Severity: normal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dear Maintainer,
https://wiki.debian.org/Firmware recommends to place manually installed firware
to
/usr/local/lib/firmware.
If the hardware is plugged in during boot, the firware cannot be loaded by udev
because it
tries to load the firware before /usr is mounted.
It does not try a second time.
See bug #729252 (duplicate?).
Thanky,
Sebastian
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.2
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/3 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlKBPSkACgkQqVj5VlP9Od3IhwCeMicePTFiUo7ci274K3oQ+BGt
UTUAn2djQNx0TVbJIJRUF3paqDr2xMHQ
=SXyt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Control: tags -1 wontfix
Bill Allombert <bill.allomb...@math.u-bordeaux1.fr> writes:
> It is not unreasonnable per se to document locations where user firmware
> will be searched by packaged softwares, but this is moot now that the
> path for manually-installed firmware and package-provided firmware is
> identical: documenting the search path for package-provided firmware is
> useful for interoperability between kernel and firmware-providing
> package.
> At the very least, the change need to be more publicized to avoid
> systems to fail to boot due to misplaced firmware after an upgrade.
Thanks for the additional background. This seems to be outside the scope
of Policy and more of a question for installation documentation,
documentation of the firmware system, or private agreement between
firmware maintainers and kernel maintainers.
I'm closing out the Policy bug accordingly.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--- End Message ---
