Martin Quinson <martin.quin...@loria.fr> writes: > Hello, an example of architecture-restricted dependency with more than > one arch should probably be added to the section 7.1 "Syntax of > relationship fields" of the policy. The document already specify that > the list is space-separated, but an example would still be welcome (at > least to me).
> I propose the following chunk: > --------->8----- > If the architecture-restricted dependency should apply to more than > one architecture, simply list all architectures between braces, > separated with spaces. Example: > Build-Depends: > libluajit5.1-dev [i386 amd64 kfreebsd-i386 armel armhf powerpc mips mipsel], > liblua5.1-dev [hurd-i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 s390x sparc], > > ----8<----------- Sure, sounds good to me. I've added an example like this for the next upload. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
