Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org> (2015-08-22): > Le Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:59:23PM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : > > > > --- devref.orig.txt 2015-08-21 22:49:46.985614431 +0200 > > +++ devref.new.txt 2015-08-21 22:58:15.226984105 +0200 > > @@ -2209,9 +2209,10 @@ > > from the first line of the debian/changelog file and places it in > > the Distribution field of the .changes file. > > > > - There are several possible values for this field: stable, > > - unstable, testing-proposed-updates and experimental. Normally, > > - packages are uploaded into unstable. > > + Packages are normally uploaded into unstable. Uploads to unstable or > > + experimental should use these suite names in the changelog entry; > > + uploads for other supported suites should use the suite codenames, > > + as they avoid any ambiguity. > > > > Actually, there are other possible distributions: codename > > -security, but read Section 5.8.5, “Handling security-related > > Thanks Didier, I think that the change reflects current practice and > should be committed. Here is a DocBook-ised version. > > diff --git a/pkgs.dbk b/pkgs.dbk > index 457619d..126eaac 100644 > --- a/pkgs.dbk > +++ b/pkgs.dbk > @@ -285,10 +285,10 @@ The package build process extracts this information > from the first line of the > <literal>Distribution</literal> field of the <filename>.changes</filename> > file. > </para> > <para> > -There are several possible values for this field: <literal>stable</literal>, > -<literal>unstable</literal>, <literal>testing-proposed-updates</literal> and > -<literal>experimental</literal>. Normally, packages are uploaded into > -<literal>unstable</literal>. > +Packages are normally uploaded into <literal>unstable</literal>. Uploads to > +<literal>unstable</literal> or <literal>experimental</literal> should use > these > +suite names in the changelog entry; uploads for other supported suites should > +use the suite codenames, as they avoid any ambiguity. > </para> > <para> > Actually, there are other possible distributions: > > Are there other comments on Didier's proposal ?
Seconded, thanks. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
