On Monday 20 July 2015 17:14:03 Josselin Mouette wrote: > Bill used his position as a policy editor to reject a change, not > because it was against consensus or against the policy process, but > because it was against his own opinion. Not as policy editor, but as > menu maintainer. > > This is the root of the problem. By asking whether the policy process > has been respected, you are reversing the responsibility. It was Billâs > responsibility from day one to recuse himself from policy decisions on > the menu. > It was also Billâs responsibility, from day one, to raise his own > concerns to the policy change being discussed, not to rely on other > peopleâs nitpicks *after* the new policy had been approved and > committed. > > Maybe, after all, this issue should not have been sent to the TC but to > the DPL, to ask for the revocation of the abused delegation.
Seconded. The debian menu is de facto dead; it is time to put it out of its misery. /Sune -- I didn’t stop pretending when I became an adult, it’s just that when I was a kid I was pretending that I fit into the rules and structures of this world. And now that I’m an adult, I pretend that those rules and structures exist. - zefrank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/16337487.0xHqSnfGRR@dabney
