On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 08:57:33PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 01:16:08AM +0400, Artem Leshchev wrote: > > Package: debian-policy > > Severity: wishlist > > > > Virtual package name 'editor' was removed from Authoritative List of Virtual > > Package Names in 1996 year, but it is used at our days. Maybe we need to > > add it > > to section "Old and obsolete virtual package names", which is empty? If yes, > > we need to file a bug against each package that uses it, so this name will > > be > > removed from repository. If no, maybe we need to add it again in the List? > > Hello Artem, > As far as I see, no packages Depends/Recommends on "editor", thought there are > still a number of package that Provides: editor. > > Since the editor virtual package is not defined, bugs should be reported > against > packages that still provides it.
This is the list of packages that 'Provides: editor' fte-console fte-terminal fte-xwindow jove jupp le levee mg nano nano-tiny ne scite vigor vile xvile vim vim-tiny Not sure whether it is wortwhile to reort all these bugs. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150211221723.GA5700@yellowpig
