On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:51:44PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Feb  1, 2015 at 23:38:24 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 12:28:22PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > Bill Allombert <ballo...@debian.org> writes:
> > > 
> > > > +             <tag>4294967294:</tag>
> > > > +             <item>
> > > > +               <p>
> > > > +                 <tt>(uid_t)(-2) == (gid_t)(-2)</tt> <em>must
> > > > +                 not</em> be used, because it is mistaken for
> > > > +                  <tt>65534</tt> <prgn>nobody</prgn> by some
> > > > +                  programs.
> > > > +               </p>
> > > > +             </item>
> > > 
> > > I would instead say:
> > > 
> > >     <em>must not</em> be used, because it is used as the anonymous,
> > >     unauthenticated user by some NFS implementations.
> > 
> > OK I offer an updated patch.
> > 
> > Third time's a charm I hope.
> > 
> Seconded.

This makes two seconds.

I have created a branch bug765499-bill with this patch that I will merge
shortly if there is no further comments. 

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballo...@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150205215330.GC27893@yellowpig

Reply via email to