On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 07:08:31PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > Thanks for your clarification. Is the attached patch OK ? > > diff --git a/virtual-package-names-list.txt b/virtual-package-names-list.txt > index f52ddba..f68133f 100644 > --- a/virtual-package-names-list.txt > +++ b/virtual-package-names-list.txt > @@ -106,7 +106,8 @@ Network > ftp-server a FTP server > httpd a HTTP server > httpd-cgi A CGI capable HTTP server > - httpd-wsgi A WSGI capable HTTP server > + httpd-wsgi A WSGI capable HTTP server (python 2 API) > + httpd-wsgi3 A WSGI capable HTTP server (python 3 API) > ident-server an identd daemon > inet-superserver an inetd server > lambdamoo-core a lambdamoo-compatible database package > @@ -343,3 +344,4 @@ Bill Allombert: > 16 Jul 2014 Added java{5,6,7,8,9}-runtime{,-headless} > Removed java1-runtime, java2-runtime > 30 Jul 2014 Added httpd-wsgi > + 23 Nov 2014 Added httpd-wsgi3
Someone else willing to review and second this ? Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150131195602.GB22780@yellowpig