Hi, Russ Allbery: > The other objection, though, was that, as a project, we don't really > *like* the MPL 2.0 license. It's a rather irritating license that we'd > rather people not use, and having it in common-licenses can be seen as a > sort of endorsement. I'm not sure how much weight to put on that > argument. > Add a README to that directory, along the lines of
>> The licenses in this directory are commonly used by software included in >> Debian; they are referred to by our packages' /usr/share/doc/*/copyright >> files. >> >> Please read <webpage> if you need advice on which license to use for a >> new project, (Do we have such a page, or do we point to an external one?) -- -- Matthias Urlichs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141107150120.ga...@smurf.noris.de
