Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> writes: > In the specific case of smarty, the software appears to be under the LGPL. > So it's a violation of the license for Debian to redistribute this without > the complete source.
Sure, but I don't think that's what Thue was asking about. The source is there; it's just not used during the build. This is akin to an upstream that ships a *.y file and the bison-generated *.c file, and a package build that uses the pre-made *.c file. Not ideal, and I'm in the camp of wanting to regenerate all such files during the build, but historically we've allowed such packages. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87egu6qwlu....@hope.eyrie.org
