Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> writes:
> Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> (2014-07-06):
>> --- debian/control.orig 2014-07-06 13:10:21.364467678 +0200
>> +++ debian/control 2014-07-06 13:10:36.516651745 +0200
>> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
>> debiandoc-sgml (>= 1.1.47),
>> docbook-dsssl,
>> docbook-xml,
>> - emacs23,
>> + emacs,
>> groff,
>> jade,
>> links | elinks,
>
> I don't think so:
> | # Currently, emacs23 is required (xemacs is not sufficient).
> | EMACS := emacs23
Assuming I understand what you're saying, the emacs metapackage is
solely for FSF emacs. Currently:
Depends: emacs24 | emacs24-lucid | emacs24-nox, ${misc:Depends}
Presumably there could eventually be an xemacs metapackage as well.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87vbq4tgcm....@trouble.defaultvalue.org
